Search results for "randomized trials"

showing 2 items of 2 documents

Update I. A systematic review on the efficacy and safety of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19

2020

Purpose To assess efficacy and safety of chloroquine (CQ)/hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for treatment or prophylaxis of COVID-19 in adult humans. Materials and methods MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE and two pre-print repositories (bioRxiv, medRxiv) were searched from inception to 8th June 2020 for RCTs and nonrandomized studies (retrospective and prospective, including single-arm, studies) addressing the use of CQ/HCQ in any dose or combination for COVID-19. Results Thirty-two studies were included (6 RCTs, 26 nonrandomized, 29,192 participants). Two RCTs had high risk, two ‘some concerns’ and two low risk of bias (Rob2). Among nonrandomized studies with comparators, nine had high risk and five moderat…

ICU Intensive care unit;medicine.medical_treatmentCritical Care and Intensive Care MedicineRR Risk Ratio0302 clinical medicineChloroquineRCT Randomized clinical trialMedicineHCQ Hydroxychloroquine;Prospective StudiesProspective cohort studyChloroquine COVID-19 Hydroxychloroquine Mortality SARS-CoV-2ChloroquineECG Electrocardiogram;Rob2 Revised tool for Risk of Bias in randomized trials;CI Confidence interval;Coronavirus InfectionsPost-Exposure ProphylaxisHydroxychloroquinemedicine.drugmedicine.medical_specialtyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Pneumonia ViralMEDLINEContext (language use)Antiviral AgentsArticleWHO World Health OrganizationBetacoronavirus03 medical and health sciencesInternal medicineHumansMortalityCOVID-19 Coronavirus disease 2019;Post-exposure prophylaxisPandemicsRetrospective StudiesCQ Chloroquine;SARS-CoV-2ROBINS-I Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions;business.industryCOVID-19030208 emergency & critical care medicineHydroxychloroquineRetrospective cohort studyHCWs Healthcare workers;NOS Newcastle Ottawa Scale;COVID-19 Drug Treatment030228 respiratory systembusinessHR Hazard Ratio;Journal of Critical Care
researchProduct

Overall survival at 5 years of follow-up in a phase III trial comparing ipilimumab 10 mg/kg with 3 mg/kg in patients with advanced melanoma

2020

BackgroundWe have previously reported significantly longer overall survival (OS) with ipilimumab 10 mg/kg versus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in patients with advanced melanoma, with higher incidences of adverse events (AEs) at 10 mg/kg. This follow-up analysis reports a 5-year update of OS and safety.MethodsThis randomized, multicenter, double-blind, phase III trial included patients with untreated or previously treated unresectable stage III or IV melanoma. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 doses. The primary end point was OS.ResultsAt a minimum follow-up of 61 months, median OS was 15.7 months (95% CI 11.6 to 17.8) at 10 mg/kg and 11.5 mont…

Cancer Researchmedicine.medical_specialty2435[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]ImmunologyMedizinIpilimumabrandomized trialsGastroenterologyAsymptomaticlaw.inventionimmunology03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineRandomized controlled triallawInternal medicinemedicineClinical endpointImmunology and Allergy1506030212 general & internal medicineAdverse effectRC254-282Clinical/Translational Cancer ImmunotherapyPharmacologybusiness.industryIncidence (epidemiology)MelanomaNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensmedicine.diseaseimmunology; oncology; randomized trials[SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio]Oncology030220 oncology & carcinogenesisoncologyMolecular Medicinemedicine.symptombusinessBrain metastasismedicine.drug
researchProduct